<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Biotech Jobs  Biochemistry  Bioengineering  Biosystems</title>
	<atom:link href="http://biotechcheck.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://biotechcheck.com</link>
	<description>Biotech Jobs  Biochemistry  Bioengineering  Biosystems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 18:09:18 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Cell Culture: Animal, Tissue culture, Organ culture, Laboratory, Passaging, Transfection, Transformation , Microbiological culture, Viral culture by Biotech Directory</title>
		<link>http://biotechcheck.com/735/cell-culture-animal-tissue-culture-organ-culture-laboratory-passaging-transfection-transformation-microbiological-culture-viral-culture/comment-page-1/#comment-5365</link>
		<dc:creator>Biotech Directory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 18:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biotechcheck.com/?p=735#comment-5365</guid>
		<description>this page has been added to our directory ,because it was interesting.

Thanking you
Biotechprofile Editor</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this page has been added to our directory ,because it was interesting.</p>
<p>Thanking you<br />
Biotechprofile Editor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics by B. Alleman</title>
		<link>http://biotechcheck.com/3229/bioinformatics-and-functional-genomics/comment-page-1/#comment-5130</link>
		<dc:creator>B. Alleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 12:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biotechcheck.com/3229/bioinformatics-and-functional-genomics/#comment-5130</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Review by B. Alleman for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/Bioinformatics-Functional-Genomics-Jonathan-Pevsner/dp/0471210048%3FSubscriptionId%3DAKIAI54QXYF27ZS7KKWQ%26tag%3Dnanosector-20%26linkCode%3Dxm2%26camp%3D2025%26creative%3D165953%26creativeASIN%3D0471210048&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Rating: &lt;img src=&quot;http://biotechcheck.com/wp-content/plugins/WPRobot3/images/4.png&quot; &gt;&lt;/b&gt;
I purchased this item new for a class I am in.  I have only read a small amount as of yet, but it seems to be a well written text.  The book came very quickly after my purchase.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Review by B. Alleman for <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Bioinformatics-Functional-Genomics-Jonathan-Pevsner/dp/0471210048%3FSubscriptionId%3DAKIAI54QXYF27ZS7KKWQ%26tag%3Dnanosector-20%26linkCode%3Dxm2%26camp%3D2025%26creative%3D165953%26creativeASIN%3D0471210048" rel="nofollow">Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics</a></i><br />
<b>Rating: <img src="http://biotechcheck.com/wp-content/plugins/WPRobot3/images/4.png" /></b><br />
I purchased this item new for a class I am in.  I have only read a small amount as of yet, but it seems to be a well written text.  The book came very quickly after my purchase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Great Terror: A Reassessment by Daniel Berger</title>
		<link>http://biotechcheck.com/3232/the-great-terror-a-reassessment/comment-page-1/#comment-5140</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Berger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 12:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biotechcheck.com/3232/the-great-terror-a-reassessment/#comment-5140</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Review by Daniel Berger for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/Great-Terror-Reassessment-Robert-Conquest/dp/0195071328%3FSubscriptionId%3DAKIAI54QXYF27ZS7KKWQ%26tag%3Dnanosector-20%26linkCode%3Dxm2%26camp%3D2025%26creative%3D165953%26creativeASIN%3D0195071328&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Great Terror: A Reassessment&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Rating: &lt;img src=&quot;http://biotechcheck.com/wp-content/plugins/WPRobot3/images/5.png&quot; &gt;&lt;/b&gt;
Which is more terrifying? Stalin&#039;s 1936-38 terror, or Western liberals&#039; inability to recognize it? Updating his original work &quot;The Great Terror&quot; with a vast amount of new data, Conquest scrupulously details and puts into context the purges themselves: the many players and defendants, the shifting political cross-currents, the rounds of trials and arrests.  
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;And he does the same for the many Western observers - intellectuals, writers, journalists, and left activists - who were oblivious to it or actively sought to hush it up, even decades later when there were no longer any shreds of doubt. This is the equivalent of Holocaust denial.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;And a Holocaust it was. While left-wing apologists pooh-poohed the numbers of purge deaths as in the thousands, the estimates of those killed politically in the people&#039;s progressive utopia are now solidly in the eight figures, with as many as 15 to 20 million arrested and executed, or worked to death in the camps, in the years up until Stalin&#039;s death in 1953.  As many more died were starved by the Communists in the Ukraine to break the peasantry a few years earlier. Yet most people seem never to have heard of any of this.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;In the Terror itself, Stalin and the NKVD prosecuted fictitious espionage, sabotage and subversion charges against millions of people. Those arrested would be tortured until they agreed to confess and implicate others. Most did, and quickly. It wound down only when the NKVD saw that, mathematically, every citizen of the nation would soon be implicated. But it flared up periodically until Stalin&#039;s death in 1953.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;The purges served several purposes. They transformed the USSR from a dictatorship of the proletariat into Stalin&#039;s despotism. They removed most previous party members and high-ranking officials, suppressing alternate notions of what Communism was about, and replaced them with ruthless Stalinists. Those persecuted included those who had been non-Bolshevik leftists, even if they since had conformed; Bolsheviks who had subscribed to Lenin&#039;s agricultural compromise delaying collectivization to boost agricultural production; Trotskyites; and finally, Stalinists and the NKVD themselves, for no ostensible reason but merely to terrify and cow.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;Stalin meanwhile could blame the country&#039;s Bolshevik-destroyed economy on the fictional sabotage &quot;confessed to&quot; in public trials, or to foreign spies. And he could blame the purge&#039;s excesses on the NKVD itself. 
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;We see the breakdown of figures and how they were derived: those executed with or without trial, those deported to slave labor camps, those executed in the camps, and those merely worked to death within them. The death rate for those sent to slave labor camps was around 90 percent. There are some camps whose mere existence cannot be confirmed firsthand because no one is known to have survived them to give testimony. 
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;This is an essential part of the anti-Communist canon, certainly on the top shelf.  Conquest&#039;s work here confirms his original book and shows that its estimates, if off in any way, were too conservative. 
&lt;br /&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Review by Daniel Berger for <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Great-Terror-Reassessment-Robert-Conquest/dp/0195071328%3FSubscriptionId%3DAKIAI54QXYF27ZS7KKWQ%26tag%3Dnanosector-20%26linkCode%3Dxm2%26camp%3D2025%26creative%3D165953%26creativeASIN%3D0195071328" rel="nofollow">The Great Terror: A Reassessment</a></i><br />
<b>Rating: <img src="http://biotechcheck.com/wp-content/plugins/WPRobot3/images/5.png" /></b><br />
Which is more terrifying? Stalin&#8217;s 1936-38 terror, or Western liberals&#8217; inability to recognize it? Updating his original work &#8220;The Great Terror&#8221; with a vast amount of new data, Conquest scrupulously details and puts into context the purges themselves: the many players and defendants, the shifting political cross-currents, the rounds of trials and arrests.  </p>
<p>And he does the same for the many Western observers &#8211; intellectuals, writers, journalists, and left activists &#8211; who were oblivious to it or actively sought to hush it up, even decades later when there were no longer any shreds of doubt. This is the equivalent of Holocaust denial.</p>
<p>And a Holocaust it was. While left-wing apologists pooh-poohed the numbers of purge deaths as in the thousands, the estimates of those killed politically in the people&#8217;s progressive utopia are now solidly in the eight figures, with as many as 15 to 20 million arrested and executed, or worked to death in the camps, in the years up until Stalin&#8217;s death in 1953.  As many more died were starved by the Communists in the Ukraine to break the peasantry a few years earlier. Yet most people seem never to have heard of any of this.</p>
<p>In the Terror itself, Stalin and the NKVD prosecuted fictitious espionage, sabotage and subversion charges against millions of people. Those arrested would be tortured until they agreed to confess and implicate others. Most did, and quickly. It wound down only when the NKVD saw that, mathematically, every citizen of the nation would soon be implicated. But it flared up periodically until Stalin&#8217;s death in 1953.</p>
<p>The purges served several purposes. They transformed the USSR from a dictatorship of the proletariat into Stalin&#8217;s despotism. They removed most previous party members and high-ranking officials, suppressing alternate notions of what Communism was about, and replaced them with ruthless Stalinists. Those persecuted included those who had been non-Bolshevik leftists, even if they since had conformed; Bolsheviks who had subscribed to Lenin&#8217;s agricultural compromise delaying collectivization to boost agricultural production; Trotskyites; and finally, Stalinists and the NKVD themselves, for no ostensible reason but merely to terrify and cow.</p>
<p>Stalin meanwhile could blame the country&#8217;s Bolshevik-destroyed economy on the fictional sabotage &#8220;confessed to&#8221; in public trials, or to foreign spies. And he could blame the purge&#8217;s excesses on the NKVD itself. </p>
<p>We see the breakdown of figures and how they were derived: those executed with or without trial, those deported to slave labor camps, those executed in the camps, and those merely worked to death within them. The death rate for those sent to slave labor camps was around 90 percent. There are some camps whose mere existence cannot be confirmed firsthand because no one is known to have survived them to give testimony. </p>
<p>This is an essential part of the anti-Communist canon, certainly on the top shelf.  Conquest&#8217;s work here confirms his original book and shows that its estimates, if off in any way, were too conservative.<br /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Great Terror: A Reassessment by secondadd</title>
		<link>http://biotechcheck.com/3232/the-great-terror-a-reassessment/comment-page-1/#comment-5139</link>
		<dc:creator>secondadd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 12:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biotechcheck.com/3232/the-great-terror-a-reassessment/#comment-5139</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Review by secondadd for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/Great-Terror-Reassessment-Robert-Conquest/dp/0195071328%3FSubscriptionId%3DAKIAI54QXYF27ZS7KKWQ%26tag%3Dnanosector-20%26linkCode%3Dxm2%26camp%3D2025%26creative%3D165953%26creativeASIN%3D0195071328&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Great Terror: A Reassessment&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Rating: &lt;img src=&quot;http://biotechcheck.com/wp-content/plugins/WPRobot3/images/4.png&quot; &gt;&lt;/b&gt;
The last review is utter nonsense:  Conquest is one of the most respected of all Soviet historians.  He clearly despises Stalin, but how could one  look upon his unfathomable devastation otherwise?  As someone who has  studied Soviet history for years, I can tell you that Conquest&#039;s writings  are right in line with nearly all books on the topic of Stalin, even those  by Marxists like Medvedev (not to mention the great Solzhenitsyn himself).   This is a good intro to the topic of Stalinist terror.  To a novice  reader, it will be a bit hard to keep all of the names straight, but it  will also be a real eye-opener -- you&#039;ll see where Orwell mined many of his  ideas.  I&#039;d strongly recommend that all readers of this gravitate to  Kravchenko&#039;s I Chose Freedom (cliched title, I know, but a great  autobiography).

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Review by secondadd for <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Great-Terror-Reassessment-Robert-Conquest/dp/0195071328%3FSubscriptionId%3DAKIAI54QXYF27ZS7KKWQ%26tag%3Dnanosector-20%26linkCode%3Dxm2%26camp%3D2025%26creative%3D165953%26creativeASIN%3D0195071328" rel="nofollow">The Great Terror: A Reassessment</a></i><br />
<b>Rating: <img src="http://biotechcheck.com/wp-content/plugins/WPRobot3/images/4.png" /></b><br />
The last review is utter nonsense:  Conquest is one of the most respected of all Soviet historians.  He clearly despises Stalin, but how could one  look upon his unfathomable devastation otherwise?  As someone who has  studied Soviet history for years, I can tell you that Conquest&#8217;s writings  are right in line with nearly all books on the topic of Stalin, even those  by Marxists like Medvedev (not to mention the great Solzhenitsyn himself).   This is a good intro to the topic of Stalinist terror.  To a novice  reader, it will be a bit hard to keep all of the names straight, but it  will also be a real eye-opener &#8212; you&#8217;ll see where Orwell mined many of his  ideas.  I&#8217;d strongly recommend that all readers of this gravitate to  Kravchenko&#8217;s I Chose Freedom (cliched title, I know, but a great  autobiography).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Genome: The Autobiography of a Species In 23 Chapters by David J. Huber</title>
		<link>http://biotechcheck.com/3231/genome-the-autobiography-of-a-species-in-23-chapters/comment-page-1/#comment-5135</link>
		<dc:creator>David J. Huber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 12:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biotechcheck.com/3231/genome-the-autobiography-of-a-species-in-23-chapters/#comment-5135</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Review by David J. Huber for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/Genome-Autobiography-Species-23-Chapters/dp/0060194979%3FSubscriptionId%3DAKIAI54QXYF27ZS7KKWQ%26tag%3Dnanosector-20%26linkCode%3Dxm2%26camp%3D2025%26creative%3D165953%26creativeASIN%3D0060194979&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Genome: The Autobiography of a Species In 23 Chapters&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Rating: &lt;img src=&quot;http://biotechcheck.com/wp-content/plugins/WPRobot3/images/5.png&quot; &gt;&lt;/b&gt;
Fascinating stuff, this genetic science, especially now that we have mapped our DNA.  This is a very well-written about genetics, in general, and some history surrounding the development of genetics and the human genome project.  It is not, however, a history of the human genome project, which I assumed it was (one must be careful when buying a book based only on the title!).  I was initially disappointed that it wasn&#039;t the story of the project, but I am very pleased at what I have learned from it.  Especially intriguing is that the author talks a lot about what genes do and don&#039;t do, and how even a gene that is linked with a disease, say Huntington&#039;s disease, isn&#039;t really something you can call The Huntington&#039;s Gene.  He&#039;s a very good writer.  He can be fairly technical at times, but even when he is, he makes sure to also make an analogy, or re-explain in easier to understand terms.  This is one of the best science books I have read simply in terms of writing that is lucid, structured, and keeps the reader wanting to read more.One major compelling point to this book is that he does include some history, including the different scientists and who fought with whom, and who continues to fight in the struggle to be the first to discover something new, and also in the struggle scientists have between each other in terms of the philosophical/cultural ramifications of certain genes.  Especially interesting is the chapter on intelligence.  The author delves into the history of the first, early and completely inappropriate IQ tests developed in the US and Britain, and the horrible fallout from them since they determined that immigrants have low IQ (which is not surprising, later criticizers have said, since the tests were in English, and many immigrants didn&#039;t speak English).  But certainly the idea of genetic intelligence is a very touchy one, but the author does bring up a number of studies that show that IQ is, in some ways, genetic; that intelligence is not completely cultural/education-based (but is also not completely genetic, either).  Of the chapters in the book, I found this one the most interesting, and especially the valid and well-done studies that have looked into the link between genetics and intelligence (and intelligence meaning and including a variety of intelligences - analytic, kinesthetic, language use, etc.), whatever the culture being studied, in whatever country.  Fascinating stuff.Some might be turned off by some of the author&#039;s intentional visibility of self.  I greatly enjoyed that instead of merely reporting the facts, he also comments on them from his own view, and also includes contrary views from contrary scientists.  While many diseases are linked to certain genes, the rest of the human behavior, while genetic (at least somewhat) is vaguely and very imperfectly known, so it is helpful for me to hear the author&#039;s opinion about what some findings could mean for the future of healthcare, school curricula, racial tensions, etc.  I don&#039;t always agree with the author, but I am very glad to have his voice in it.  And also very glad that his voice is based more on reason, than any particular ideology - I certainly cannot tell whether he is religious or anti-religion, whether he might be Christian, Buddhist, Jewish or anything else, or whether he is liberal or conservative.  It&#039;s welcome to have his voice, and to have his voice be reasonable and even-handed.  I found myself thinking much more about certain points simply because he offered an opinion (and/or offered the opinions of scientists who disagree with each other).  A great book overall, and a wonderful introduction into what genetics is and isn&#039;t, and how far it has come in the last 5 years. Important reading, and very well-written.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Review by David J. Huber for <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Genome-Autobiography-Species-23-Chapters/dp/0060194979%3FSubscriptionId%3DAKIAI54QXYF27ZS7KKWQ%26tag%3Dnanosector-20%26linkCode%3Dxm2%26camp%3D2025%26creative%3D165953%26creativeASIN%3D0060194979" rel="nofollow">Genome: The Autobiography of a Species In 23 Chapters</a></i><br />
<b>Rating: <img src="http://biotechcheck.com/wp-content/plugins/WPRobot3/images/5.png" /></b><br />
Fascinating stuff, this genetic science, especially now that we have mapped our DNA.  This is a very well-written about genetics, in general, and some history surrounding the development of genetics and the human genome project.  It is not, however, a history of the human genome project, which I assumed it was (one must be careful when buying a book based only on the title!).  I was initially disappointed that it wasn&#8217;t the story of the project, but I am very pleased at what I have learned from it.  Especially intriguing is that the author talks a lot about what genes do and don&#8217;t do, and how even a gene that is linked with a disease, say Huntington&#8217;s disease, isn&#8217;t really something you can call The Huntington&#8217;s Gene.  He&#8217;s a very good writer.  He can be fairly technical at times, but even when he is, he makes sure to also make an analogy, or re-explain in easier to understand terms.  This is one of the best science books I have read simply in terms of writing that is lucid, structured, and keeps the reader wanting to read more.One major compelling point to this book is that he does include some history, including the different scientists and who fought with whom, and who continues to fight in the struggle to be the first to discover something new, and also in the struggle scientists have between each other in terms of the philosophical/cultural ramifications of certain genes.  Especially interesting is the chapter on intelligence.  The author delves into the history of the first, early and completely inappropriate IQ tests developed in the US and Britain, and the horrible fallout from them since they determined that immigrants have low IQ (which is not surprising, later criticizers have said, since the tests were in English, and many immigrants didn&#8217;t speak English).  But certainly the idea of genetic intelligence is a very touchy one, but the author does bring up a number of studies that show that IQ is, in some ways, genetic; that intelligence is not completely cultural/education-based (but is also not completely genetic, either).  Of the chapters in the book, I found this one the most interesting, and especially the valid and well-done studies that have looked into the link between genetics and intelligence (and intelligence meaning and including a variety of intelligences &#8211; analytic, kinesthetic, language use, etc.), whatever the culture being studied, in whatever country.  Fascinating stuff.Some might be turned off by some of the author&#8217;s intentional visibility of self.  I greatly enjoyed that instead of merely reporting the facts, he also comments on them from his own view, and also includes contrary views from contrary scientists.  While many diseases are linked to certain genes, the rest of the human behavior, while genetic (at least somewhat) is vaguely and very imperfectly known, so it is helpful for me to hear the author&#8217;s opinion about what some findings could mean for the future of healthcare, school curricula, racial tensions, etc.  I don&#8217;t always agree with the author, but I am very glad to have his voice in it.  And also very glad that his voice is based more on reason, than any particular ideology &#8211; I certainly cannot tell whether he is religious or anti-religion, whether he might be Christian, Buddhist, Jewish or anything else, or whether he is liberal or conservative.  It&#8217;s welcome to have his voice, and to have his voice be reasonable and even-handed.  I found myself thinking much more about certain points simply because he offered an opinion (and/or offered the opinions of scientists who disagree with each other).  A great book overall, and a wonderful introduction into what genetics is and isn&#8217;t, and how far it has come in the last 5 years. Important reading, and very well-written.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Genome: The Autobiography of a Species In 23 Chapters by Roger McEvilly (the guilty bystander)</title>
		<link>http://biotechcheck.com/3231/genome-the-autobiography-of-a-species-in-23-chapters/comment-page-1/#comment-5134</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger McEvilly (the guilty bystander)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biotechcheck.com/3231/genome-the-autobiography-of-a-species-in-23-chapters/#comment-5134</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Review by Roger McEvilly (the guilty bystander) for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/Genome-Autobiography-Species-23-Chapters/dp/0060194979%3FSubscriptionId%3DAKIAI54QXYF27ZS7KKWQ%26tag%3Dnanosector-20%26linkCode%3Dxm2%26camp%3D2025%26creative%3D165953%26creativeASIN%3D0060194979&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Genome: The Autobiography of a Species In 23 Chapters&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Rating: &lt;img src=&quot;http://biotechcheck.com/wp-content/plugins/WPRobot3/images/4.png&quot; &gt;&lt;/b&gt;
This is an excellent overview of current scientific discovery and argument regarding that inheritently common, but innately variable blueprint of 23 pairs of chromosones we all share. Our knowledge of our genes is progressing at a rapid rate, so much so, that by the time I finish writing  this sentence, our knowledge of the human genetic code has been updated. If  you wish to know what kinds of things are being discovered, this book is a  very good place to find it.Matt Ridley devotes each chapter to one of  our chromosones-23 in all, and describes some useful dicoveries and  speculations regarding each. From such things as the ability to digest  lactose, blood groups, cancer suppressors, &#039;instinct&#039;,intelligence, ethics,  free will, allergies, aspects of language, ageing, sex, cloning, test tube  babies, Mad Cow disease etc, he describes in a clever and clear way the  discoveries being made in the field. I would give the book 4 1/2  stars,(but there are no halves in these reviews), as no book is ever  perfect, but a point to remember is no understanding of our world, or our  genes themselves, is ever perfect either. But we can find pieces to the  puzzle, useful and uplifting, and that is what this book is about.   Ridleys style is clear and clever, my only quibble is that he displays  perhaps just a touch of arrogance, and a subtle air of bias. But give the  author his due, an author is entitled to his opinions and leanings, what is  important is that he generally makes it clear when he does so. The book  is highly recommended for both those familiar with the jargon, and those  with enthusiastic minds who wish to learn about it.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Review by Roger McEvilly (the guilty bystander) for <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Genome-Autobiography-Species-23-Chapters/dp/0060194979%3FSubscriptionId%3DAKIAI54QXYF27ZS7KKWQ%26tag%3Dnanosector-20%26linkCode%3Dxm2%26camp%3D2025%26creative%3D165953%26creativeASIN%3D0060194979" rel="nofollow">Genome: The Autobiography of a Species In 23 Chapters</a></i><br />
<b>Rating: <img src="http://biotechcheck.com/wp-content/plugins/WPRobot3/images/4.png" /></b><br />
This is an excellent overview of current scientific discovery and argument regarding that inheritently common, but innately variable blueprint of 23 pairs of chromosones we all share. Our knowledge of our genes is progressing at a rapid rate, so much so, that by the time I finish writing  this sentence, our knowledge of the human genetic code has been updated. If  you wish to know what kinds of things are being discovered, this book is a  very good place to find it.Matt Ridley devotes each chapter to one of  our chromosones-23 in all, and describes some useful dicoveries and  speculations regarding each. From such things as the ability to digest  lactose, blood groups, cancer suppressors, &#8216;instinct&#8217;,intelligence, ethics,  free will, allergies, aspects of language, ageing, sex, cloning, test tube  babies, Mad Cow disease etc, he describes in a clever and clear way the  discoveries being made in the field. I would give the book 4 1/2  stars,(but there are no halves in these reviews), as no book is ever  perfect, but a point to remember is no understanding of our world, or our  genes themselves, is ever perfect either. But we can find pieces to the  puzzle, useful and uplifting, and that is what this book is about.   Ridleys style is clear and clever, my only quibble is that he displays  perhaps just a touch of arrogance, and a subtle air of bias. But give the  author his due, an author is entitled to his opinions and leanings, what is  important is that he generally makes it clear when he does so. The book  is highly recommended for both those familiar with the jargon, and those  with enthusiastic minds who wish to learn about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A-Z of Quantitative PCR (IUL Biotechnology, No. 5) (Iul Biotechnology Series) by Maite Reader</title>
		<link>http://biotechcheck.com/3227/a-z-of-quantitative-pcr-iul-biotechnology-no-5-iul-biotechnology-series/comment-page-1/#comment-5124</link>
		<dc:creator>Maite Reader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biotechcheck.com/3227/a-z-of-quantitative-pcr-iul-biotechnology-no-5-iul-biotechnology-series/#comment-5124</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Review by Maite Reader for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/Quantitative-PCR-IUL-Biotechnology-No/dp/0963681788%3FSubscriptionId%3DAKIAI54QXYF27ZS7KKWQ%26tag%3Dnanosector-20%26linkCode%3Dxm2%26camp%3D2025%26creative%3D165953%26creativeASIN%3D0963681788&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;A-Z of Quantitative PCR (IUL Biotechnology, No. 5) (Iul Biotechnology Series)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Rating: &lt;img src=&quot;http://biotechcheck.com/wp-content/plugins/WPRobot3/images/5.png&quot; &gt;&lt;/b&gt;
Very complete book, containing practical exemples of calculations and solutions for the main issues faced when running quantitative PCR. Excelent daily manual.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Review by Maite Reader for <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Quantitative-PCR-IUL-Biotechnology-No/dp/0963681788%3FSubscriptionId%3DAKIAI54QXYF27ZS7KKWQ%26tag%3Dnanosector-20%26linkCode%3Dxm2%26camp%3D2025%26creative%3D165953%26creativeASIN%3D0963681788" rel="nofollow">A-Z of Quantitative PCR (IUL Biotechnology, No. 5) (Iul Biotechnology Series)</a></i><br />
<b>Rating: <img src="http://biotechcheck.com/wp-content/plugins/WPRobot3/images/5.png" /></b><br />
Very complete book, containing practical exemples of calculations and solutions for the main issues faced when running quantitative PCR. Excelent daily manual.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://biotechcheck.com/3229/bioinformatics-and-functional-genomics/comment-page-1/#comment-5129</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biotechcheck.com/3229/bioinformatics-and-functional-genomics/#comment-5129</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Review by  for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/Bioinformatics-Functional-Genomics-Jonathan-Pevsner/dp/0471210048%3FSubscriptionId%3DAKIAI54QXYF27ZS7KKWQ%26tag%3Dnanosector-20%26linkCode%3Dxm2%26camp%3D2025%26creative%3D165953%26creativeASIN%3D0471210048&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Rating: &lt;img src=&quot;http://biotechcheck.com/wp-content/plugins/WPRobot3/images/5.png&quot; &gt;&lt;/b&gt;
&quot;...an intriguing work targeted toward biologists wanting to solve problems...provides a compendium of many biological insights and breakthroughs and will be a useful resource...highly recommended.&quot; (Choice, Vol. 41, No. 7, March 2004)

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Review by  for <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Bioinformatics-Functional-Genomics-Jonathan-Pevsner/dp/0471210048%3FSubscriptionId%3DAKIAI54QXYF27ZS7KKWQ%26tag%3Dnanosector-20%26linkCode%3Dxm2%26camp%3D2025%26creative%3D165953%26creativeASIN%3D0471210048" rel="nofollow">Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics</a></i><br />
<b>Rating: <img src="http://biotechcheck.com/wp-content/plugins/WPRobot3/images/5.png" /></b><br />
&#8220;&#8230;an intriguing work targeted toward biologists wanting to solve problems&#8230;provides a compendium of many biological insights and breakthroughs and will be a useful resource&#8230;highly recommended.&#8221; (Choice, Vol. 41, No. 7, March 2004)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Immortal by D. Kowalski</title>
		<link>http://biotechcheck.com/3222/immortal/comment-page-1/#comment-5115</link>
		<dc:creator>D. Kowalski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biotechcheck.com/3222/immortal/#comment-5115</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Review by D. Kowalski for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/Immortal-ebook/dp/B0014GL9KE%3FSubscriptionId%3DAKIAI54QXYF27ZS7KKWQ%26tag%3Dnanosector-20%26linkCode%3Dxm2%26camp%3D2025%26creative%3D165953%26creativeASIN%3DB0014GL9KE&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Immortal&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Rating: &lt;img src=&quot;http://biotechcheck.com/wp-content/plugins/WPRobot3/images/1.png&quot; &gt;&lt;/b&gt;
If someone is going to write a book attacking cutting edge medicine then the least they could do is to do some research. This book is moronic and not even slightly entertaining...At least I didnt waste money on it since I used my local library...but I still cant get back the time I wasted reading it! My recommendation...dont bother there is so many better books on the subject ie, the first immortal, and youniverse ect.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Review by D. Kowalski for <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Immortal-ebook/dp/B0014GL9KE%3FSubscriptionId%3DAKIAI54QXYF27ZS7KKWQ%26tag%3Dnanosector-20%26linkCode%3Dxm2%26camp%3D2025%26creative%3D165953%26creativeASIN%3DB0014GL9KE" rel="nofollow">Immortal</a></i><br />
<b>Rating: <img src="http://biotechcheck.com/wp-content/plugins/WPRobot3/images/1.png" /></b><br />
If someone is going to write a book attacking cutting edge medicine then the least they could do is to do some research. This book is moronic and not even slightly entertaining&#8230;At least I didnt waste money on it since I used my local library&#8230;but I still cant get back the time I wasted reading it! My recommendation&#8230;dont bother there is so many better books on the subject ie, the first immortal, and youniverse ect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A-Z of Quantitative PCR (IUL Biotechnology, No. 5) (Iul Biotechnology Series) by Mark Wolfe</title>
		<link>http://biotechcheck.com/3227/a-z-of-quantitative-pcr-iul-biotechnology-no-5-iul-biotechnology-series/comment-page-1/#comment-5123</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wolfe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biotechcheck.com/3227/a-z-of-quantitative-pcr-iul-biotechnology-no-5-iul-biotechnology-series/#comment-5123</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Review by Mark Wolfe for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/Quantitative-PCR-IUL-Biotechnology-No/dp/0963681788%3FSubscriptionId%3DAKIAI54QXYF27ZS7KKWQ%26tag%3Dnanosector-20%26linkCode%3Dxm2%26camp%3D2025%26creative%3D165953%26creativeASIN%3D0963681788&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;A-Z of Quantitative PCR (IUL Biotechnology, No. 5) (Iul Biotechnology Series)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Rating: &lt;img src=&quot;http://biotechcheck.com/wp-content/plugins/WPRobot3/images/5.png&quot; &gt;&lt;/b&gt;
This is a very good reference book for my Molecular Lab.  Every Molecular lab should have this book.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Review by Mark Wolfe for <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Quantitative-PCR-IUL-Biotechnology-No/dp/0963681788%3FSubscriptionId%3DAKIAI54QXYF27ZS7KKWQ%26tag%3Dnanosector-20%26linkCode%3Dxm2%26camp%3D2025%26creative%3D165953%26creativeASIN%3D0963681788" rel="nofollow">A-Z of Quantitative PCR (IUL Biotechnology, No. 5) (Iul Biotechnology Series)</a></i><br />
<b>Rating: <img src="http://biotechcheck.com/wp-content/plugins/WPRobot3/images/5.png" /></b><br />
This is a very good reference book for my Molecular Lab.  Every Molecular lab should have this book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

