Top

Sindora goes big into biotech sector with purchase of Microwell

March 25, 2010 by biotechcheck.com · Leave a Comment 

Sindora goes huge into biotech sector with buy of Microwell
SINDORA Bhd (6106), a Johor Corp subsidiary, is going into biotechnology in a huge way, following its 60 per cent equity acquisition of bio-fertiliser manufacturer Microwell Sdn Bhd. For starters, Sindora, which has eight companies under its belt, is setting up a RM36 million biofertiliser works in Bandar Tenggara, Johor, by mid-2011. Sindora chairman Tan Sri Muhammad Ali Hashim stated the …

Read more on Business Times (Malaysia)

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Introduction to Biofertilisers

March 25, 2010 by biotechcheck.com · Leave a Comment 


Introduction to the Biofertilisers. This presentation is an assignment submitted to UGC Academic Staff College, University of Mumbai, in the 92nd Orientation course. Intructor For the Assignment: Mr. Piran Doctor

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Azolla Plant

March 25, 2010 by biotechcheck.com · Leave a Comment 


Azolla growing in a pond creaates a amusing green carpet.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Organic Soil Fertility Management for Enhanced Paddy Production

March 25, 2010 by biotechcheck.com · Leave a Comment 

ORGANIC SOIL FERTILITY MANAGEMENT FOR ENHANCED PADDY PRODUCTION AND REVENUE GENERATION WITH LESS COST AS ACHIEVED IN SOME MODEL PADDY FIELDS IN ORISSA

A.K. Panigrahix1, T.R. Sahoox2, H.S. Beherax3 and N.K. Swainx4

ABSTRACT:

Green revolution was introduced in the country in the primeval sixties to meet the demand of food and add cereal cultivation in the Rabi. The aftermath of this revolution is alarmingly disastrous. The humus devoid soil has lost its water holding ability, pests have acquired tremendous resistance against pesticides. Indian paddy fields are adding roughly about 37.8 metric tonnes of methane, a green home gas, into the atmosphere. Food and underground water contaminated with pesticides.

The environmental deteriorations, food and water contaminations demand a paradigm shift from chemical to organic agriculture. With the growing demand of food, diminishing arable land holdings and exodus of the agrarian communities from villages to towns abandoning agriculture, only organic farming will not suffice. The new technique conceived is known as sustainable agriculture, where soil fertility, crop yield and pest management are taken care of together with the environmental protection. This method of agriculture is in harmony with the nature. The article examines three ex situ experiments where the above mentioned issues are analyzed along with the cost benefit ratio and throws light in making agriculture sustainable.

INTRODUCTION

More than six decades ago,Sir Albert Howard explained the nature of soil fertility in his famous book, “An agricultural Testament” as under. The nature of soil fertility can be understood only when it is considered in relation to Nature’s round. To study soil fertility we have to know the natural working system and to adopt methods of investigation in strict relation to such a subject. We must look at soil fertility as we would study a business where the profit and loss statement must be taken along with the equilibrise sheet, the standing of the concern, and the method of management. We have to think about the wood, not the individual tree. So it is with soil fertility. According to him, a fertile soil is one which has humus in abundance. If the soil is deficient in humus, the volume of pore space is reduced, the aeration of the soil is impeded, there is insufficient organic matter for the soil population, the soil machinary runs down, the supply of oxygen, water and dissolved salts needed by the root hairs is reduced, the synthesis of carbohydrates and proteins in the green leaf proceeds at a lower tempo; growth is affected.

CHEMICAL AGRICULTURE, Impact Analysis;

Then came the war and the war ended sooner than expected, resulting in stock piling of war surplus exploxive related materials, mostly compounds of nitrogen and phosphorus. Global approach to agriculture altered in the event of population growth and developments in material and biological sciences. New seeds were developed and introduced to enhance food production which soon became favourite in populous countries like India, China, South East Asian Countries and Japan. War surplus chemicals were converted into compounds called artificial chemical fertilizers. The seeds, popularly called “Green revolution seeds” or “Miracle seeds”, were developed to consume these synthetic artificial chemical fertilizers with water and

produce more food. Thus, monoculture came into being at the expense of agro biodiversity and resources like water diminished.

Four decades into the green revolution in India, the situation is pathetic; soil in general has become humus deficient, excessively hard and bears no pores for holding air and moisture. This soil no longer harbours the beneficial microbes but the pathogens and pest eggs, requiring excessive use of synthetic pesticides. The impacts of these agro chemicals, the artificial chemical fertilizers and synthetic pesticides are well observable. No data have been published by any the Indian agencies like the US Environment Protection Bureau (USEPA). The USEPA revealed in 1991 that the projected estimate of methane emission from the Indian paddy fields amounted to 37.8 metric tonnes per year, thus accusing the Indian paddy cultivators in adding to the global green home gas accumulation as methane is also considered as a green home gas. Consequently in Indian more emphasis is now attached to shift to non conventional agriculture and keep paddy cultivation limited to 47 percent of the total arable land. Use of artificial chemical fertilizers especially N- fertilizers always invite the agricultural pests and applications of pesticides, especially synthetic pesticides. The disastrous consequences of the use of these synthetic pesticides over several decades are now clearly observable. There is a rise of pesticides resistance in the pest species and diseases causing microbes at the expense of the beneficial organisms like the beneficial insects (honey bee) and scavenging birds (vultures). Reports of crop unfortunate are also linked to the changes in natural position of the soil. Reports of methane emission are obviously owing to excessive use of nitrogenous fertilizers like Urea. Reports of occurance of agricultural pesticides in underground water (bottled water and soft drinks) are certainly due to their excessive applications and non degradations. There are reports of people in villages dying after consuming water from shallow tube wells in Orissa (Chakulia, Balasore, 2005).

HYPOTHESIS

It was thus felt essential to find a solution to both, enhance crop yield through enhanced soil fertility organically without further degrading its position and keep the pathogens and pests at bay through the use of natural pest repellants, botanical pesticides and employing biological pest control methods. But the most important one is, following Sir Howard, to bring out a equilibrise sheet of profit- loss, making cultivation a profitable enterprise so that uncalled for future situations like resource retirement, contract farming and above all exodus of the agrarian communities from villages to cities are successfully thwarted. In India, agriculture is a million year old enterprise and has changed Sir Howard from being an western expert to an oriental expert. The population is growing alarmingly but arable land is diminishing. The farmers are committing suicides owing crop failures. There ought to be a shift in approach to the whole practice of agriculture at the moment. The modern agriculture should be prefabricated sustainable, i.e., in harmony with the nature. With the foregone objectives set in mind the authors experimented with the principal crop of Orissa, i.e. paddy cultivation, both in Kharif and Rabi.Methodology of approach, application, attending and cost benefit ratio of three such ex situ experiments, one of Rabi and the two others of Kharif are furnished below.

Material Method and Observations:

Experiment-1 : Rabi 2003 -04

Farmer’s study and address – Sri Surendra Nath Patra, Vill- Dharampur, Fulwar Kasba, Balasore, Orissa.

Soil type – Deltaic alluvial

Crop type- Paddy (HYV)- Lalat (ORS-26-2014-4) known qualities – Duration: 125-130 days.

Grain type: Medium * Slender, Grain yield/hectare: 40 quintals (as on record)

Experimental Unit Area: 1 Acre

Source of seed : Farmers own saved (OS)

SL No.. Activities associated Control Rs Chemical Rs. Organic Rs

1. Seed cost OS 0.00 OS 0.00 OS 0.00

2. Seed bed preparation 2HL 100.00 2HL 100.00 2HL 100.00

1BL 80.00 1BL 80.00 1BL 80.00

3. Ist cultivation Tractor 600.00 Tractor 600.00 Tractor 600.00

(2 hours) (2 hours) (2 hours)

4. Farm yard manure Not applied Not applied 2 tonnes 0.00

(II)

5. Puddling 6 HL 300.00 6HL 300.00 6HL 300.00

2BL 160.00 2BL 160.00 2BL 160.00

6. Basal application Nil Gromor Pongam 70 kg 700.00 Oil cake MOP 1qt. 400.00 20 kg 100.00 Azolla 0.00

(I.I)

7. Transplantation 35HL 1750.00 40 HL 2000.00 35 HL 1750.00

8. Interculture 5HL 250.00 7HL 350.00 5 HL 250.00

9. a) Ist top dressing Nil Urea Pongam Oilcake

12 kg 60.00 50 kg 200.00

MOP Cow urine

6kg 30.00 250 lts. 0.00 (I.I)

b) 2nd top dressing Nil Urea

10 kg 50.00 Cow urine

MOP 250 lts. 0.00 5kg 25.00 (I.I)

10. Pesticide application Nil 400.00 200.00

(lure appln.)

11. Irrigation (total) 250.00 250.00 250.00

12. Cutting of crop 15HL 750.00 18HL 900.00 15HL 750.00

13. Threshing 10HL 500.00 13HL 650.00 10HL 500.00

14. Miscellaneous expenses Nil 100.00 150.00

(pest management)

15. Total cost involved(in Rs) 4740.00 6855.00 5690.00

16. a.Yield of grains 12.7qntls. 20.2qntls 23.5qntls

@520/-per qntl @520/-qntl @520/-qntl

6604.00 10504.00 12220.00

b.Yield of straw 15.85qntls 25.07qntls 29.47qntls

@80/-=1268.00 @70/-=1755.00 @80/-=2358.00

17. Total yield(in terms of Rs.) 7,872.00 12,259.00 14578.00

18. Net benefit 3,132.00 5,404.00 8,888.00

19. Cost benefit Ratio (17/15) 1.66 1.788 2.562

Experiment -2: Kharif 2004-05:

Name and address of the farmer: Raghunath Barik, Bhimpur

Soil type: Coastal alluvial Crop type: Paddy HYV (Pooja) (recently introduced)

Experimental unit area: 1 Acre Source of seed: Farmer’s own saved seed (0S)

SL No.. Activities associated Control Rs Chemical Rs. Organic Rs

1. Seed cost OS 0.00 OS 0.00 OS 0.00

2. Seed bed preparation 2HL 100.00 2HL 100.00 2HL 100.00

1BL 80.00 1BL 80.00 1BL 80.00

3. Ist cultivation Tractor Tractor Tractor

2hrs 600.00 2hrs. 600.00 2hrs. 600.00

4. Farm yard Manure Not applied Not applied 2 tonnes (II) 0.00

5. Puddling 6HL 300.00 6HL 300.00 6HL 300.00

2BL 160.00 2BL 160.00 2BL 160.00

6. Basal application NIL Gromor Pongam oil cake

70 kg 700.00 1.5q 600.00

MOP Sesbania

20kg 100.00 10kg 110.00

B.F 500gm. 100.00

V.C. 5 qntls.

(I.I) 0.00

7. Transplantation 35HL 1750.00 40HL 20000.00 35HL 1750.00

8. Interculture 8HL 400.00 10HL 500.00 8HL 400.00

9. Ist Top dressing Nil Urea Bacterial fertiliser

12kg 60.00 250 gm 50.00

MOP Compost 2.5qntls.

6kg 30.00 (1.1) 0.00

10. 2nd top dressing Nil Urea Bacterial fertilizers

10kg 50.00 250 gm 50.00

MOP Compost 2.5qntls.

5kg 25.00 (1.1) 0.00

11. Pesticide application Nil Total 400.00 (1.1) 0.00

12. Crop cutting 15HL 750.00 18HL 900.00 15HL 750.00

13. Threshing 10HL 500.00 13HL 650.00 10HL 500.00

14. Miscellaneous Nil 100.00 150.00

15. Total cost involved (in Rs.) 4,640.00 6,755.00 5,700.00

16. a. Yield of grain 16.50qntl. 8,580.00 21.9qntl. 11,388.00 22.10qntl. 11,492/-

b. Yield of straw 22.10qntl 1,768.00 27.5qntl 1,925.00 29.4qntl 2,352/-

c. Total yield(in Rs.) 10,348.00 13,313.00 13,844/-

17. Net benefit 5,708.00 6,558.00 8,144/-

18. Cost benefit ratio (16c/15) 2.23 1.971 2.429

Soil fertility condition of the above crop at different stages.

Plot N (Kg/ha) P (Kg/ha) K(Kg/ha)

Subiah and Asija, 1956 Olsen’s method Ammonium Acetate method (alkaline potassium permanganate)

Initial 45DAT After Initial 45DAT After Initial 45DAT After

harvest harvest harvest

Control 511.9 499.4 426.49 50.00 44.6 15.2 312.0 300.8 200.25

Chemical 511.9 561.2 520.57 50.00 52.2 26.16 312.0 346.6 241.9

Organic 511.9 560.7 564.4 50.00 43.7 18.24 312.0 336.8 251.32

Experiment. 3. Kharif 2004-05

Name and address of the farmer: Sri Pitamber Jena,

At- Mangalpur, P.O.- Chengua- Mangalpur, Via- Bhimda, Dist; Mayurbhanj (Orissa)

Soil type : Sandy loam

Crop type : Paddy (HYV) Kasturi

Source of seed : Purchased from other farmer (PI)

(7.5 kg @ 5/- per kg= Rs. 37.50p)

Known yield potential of the variety (Kasturi) ± 20 quintals per acre (chemical)

Plot size : 30 decimals (100 decimals = 1 Acre)

Ingredients applied:

1. Sesbania (Dhanicha) seed @ 12 kg/acre = 3kg 600gm @ Rs. 11/- 1 kg = Rs. 39.60p)

2. Pongam oil cake @ 150kg/acre = 45 kg @ Rs. 4/-kg = Rs. 180.00

3. Cow urine soaked cowshed soil @ 4 quintals / acre= 1.2 quintals (Internal input)

4. Fresh cow urine @ 7-8 liters twice in a week for 6 weeks (internal input)

5. Home prefabricated heap compost – 2 cartloads (I I)

MATERIAL METHOD

Sesbania seeds were sown in the soil after the first ploughing and granted to grow up to preflowering stage where after the field was ploughed and the plants were incorporated into the soil together with pongam oil cake, cow urine soaked cowshed soil and home prefabricated compost. The farm land top soil was thus converted into a paste of soil, sesbania plants, pongam oil cake, urine soaked cow shed soil, home prefabricated compost and stagnated water (just enough to create a muddy condition). It was granted to stand overnight. The field was then transplanted with the paddy seedlings two days after. Thereafter, the field was periodically weeded and fresh cow urine applied at regular intervals to add more potash* to the soil.

[*The authors found out that fresh cow urine is a rich source of acquirable potash to the plants and help in superior fruiting.]

OBSERVATION:

1. Soil samples were collected at different stages for study of soil fertility conditions and the NPK values were ascertained.

Study of sample N(Kg/ha) P(Kg/ha) K(K/ha)

Initial 283.7 42.6 168.3

45 DAT 458.2 45.8 273.6

75 DAT 462.1 39.9 260.1

After harvest 393.6 35.2 254.7

2. Yeild of grains at harvest: 8.5 quintals (@ 28.33 quintals/acre –or- 70 quintals/hectare)

3. Yeild of straw at harvest : 9.9 quintals (@ 32.9 quintals / acre)

Cost Benefit Index :

1. Total expenditure incurred: Rs. 1317.10

A. Ingredients: (purchased input)

i. Cost of paddy seeds : Rs 37.50

ii. Cost of sesbania seeds : Rs. 39.60

iii. Cost of pongam oil cake : Rs. 180.00

B. Labour:

i. Seed bed preparation 1 HL : Rs. 50.00

ii. Ist cultivation 1 BL : Rs. 80.00

iii. Puddling I BL : Rs 80.00

iv. Transplantation 10 HL : Rs. 500.00

v. Interculture 1HL : Rs. 50.00

vi. Crop slicing 4 HL : Rs. 200.00

vii. Threshing 2HL : Rs. 100.00

2. Total understanding proceeds of yield:

i.Value of grain,

8.5 quintals@ 600/- per quintal = : Rs. 5100.00

ii Value of straw,

9.9 quintals@ 80/-per quintals = : Rs. 792.00

———————

TOTAL Rs. 5892.00

3. Cost benefit ratio (2/1) = 4.47

Abbreviations used :

HL = Human labour, BL =Bullock Labour, MOP = Muriate of potash, N= Nitrogen (total), P= Phosphorus (available), K= Potash(available),II= Internal input, PI=– Bought input, B.F.= Bacterial Feriliser, V.C.= VermiCompost.

x1 – Principal Investigator, UGC MRP Organic Farming, F.M. (Auto) College, Balasore (Orissa)756001

x2- Project Associate, UGC MRP Organic Farming, F.M.(Auto) College, Balasore(Orissa) 756001

x3- Research Associates, PPBSA- Navdanya, Ranipatna, Balasore(Orissa) 756001.

x4- Co-investigator, UGC MRP Organic Farming, F.M.(Auto) College, Balasore(Orissa) 756001

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:

The authors are indebted to the University Allows Commission, Bahadur shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi-2, and the Navdanya Trust, A/60 hauz Khas, New Delhi-16 for the financial assistances received from them to undertake the ex- situ field studies and work assessments.

References:

Avery, D.1995 saving the planet with pesticides and plastic. Indian polis, the Hudson Institute

Blobaum, Roger. 1983 Barriers to conversion to organic farming practices in the mid western United States.Environmentally sound agriculture, William Lockeretz (ed.), Praeger, New York, N.Y.

Borlaug,N. 1994 agricultural research for sustainable development. Testimony before U.S. Home of Representatives Committee on agriculture, 1994

Cacek, Terry. 1984. Organic Farming “the other conservation farming system. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation ; 39:357-360

Dahama, A.K. 1998 Agro’Annual Review of Crop Ecology, Vol. 1

Dindal 1990 Soil Biology Guide. John Wiley and Sons. New York, N.Y.

Eberle,P and D. Holland 1979 comparing organic and conventional grain farms in Washington

Fliessbach,A.,Eyhorn, F., Mader,P., Rentsch, D.and Hany,R. 2001 DOK long term farming system trial; microbial biomass, activity and diversity …… Sustainable management of organic matter, London, CABI

Gliessman, S.R. 1988 Agro Ecology; Ecological Process in Sustainable Agriculture, Ann Arbor Press, Michigan(US)

Gupta, P.K. 2004 a hand book of soil, fertilizer and manure (2nd edition)

Harwood,R.R. 1984 Organic Farming Research……. and its role in sustainable agriculture, Madison, Wisconsin.

Howard, Sir Albert,1940 An Agricultural Testament, Other India Press, Mapusa, Goa, India/RFSTE,NewDelhi.

India 1995. A Reference Annual , publication division, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Government of India.

Joshi, V.A., Et. Al. 1995 Nitrate in rural area in Nagpur, IZZEP, 15(6)

Kansal, B.D., Et. Al. 1981 Effect of different levers of nitrogen and farm yard manure on yield and calibre of spinach

Qual.Plant. plant foods human nutrition 31

Lal. R., Stewart , B. A. 1992 need for land restoration. Adv. soil science

Lampkin, N.H. and Padel, S. 1994 organic farming and agricultural policy in western Europe; an overview.

CAB International, Wallingford

McNaughton, S.L. and L.L. Wolf 1973 General Ecology , Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York

Nannipieri,P.S. and B. Cencanti. 1990 Ecological significance of the biological activity in soil, Soil Biochemistry, Vol.6Marceldekker, New. York

Odum,E.P. 1971 Fundamentals of Ecology, Saunders, Philadelphia

Parr.J.F. Et.Al. 1986 Recycling of organic wastes for a sustainable agriculture Bio.Ag.Hort 3: 115-130

Roberts. K. J. t.Al 1979 The economic of organic crop production, Ag.Eco.P. No.1979-6, University of Missouri, Colombia

Sharma A.K. 2004 A Hand Book of Organic Farming, AGROBIOS(INDIA)

Sultan A. Ismail 1997 Vermicology; the Biology of Earthworms, Orient Longman

Verma, L.N. 1993 Biofertilisers in agriculture, Peekay Tree Crops Development Foundation, Cochin.

Author is an avid natrure analyst,has worked on & written books,research papers and short & massive articles on several aspects of the nature such as farming,forest,food and water etc.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

New Generation Textile Recycling ? An Outlook

March 25, 2010 by biotechcheck.com · Leave a Comment 

Perspective of age old days: population was less, needs were few and resources were abundant. The generation of waste was such that it got naturally recycled, being mostly biodegradable. Conversely, after the advent of industrial revolution, different types of wastes came into existence which are often both non-biodegradable and highly hazardous. Production is always associated with some form of pollution and in specific cotton cultivation, production and processing, releases various types of waste at apiece level.

Reports illustrate that, among the total waste from textile, the largest part comes from the spinning mills, most particularly the blow room. Spinning is one of the vital industries of India and the 4000 ginning factories around the country produce considerable amount of waste during cotton ginning operation. Most of the mills, recover the useful short fibers from the blow room waste by passing them through willow machines, that inturn leaves a non resalable residue called “willow waste”. The scope of the waste from cotton industry extends its products to upholstery cloth, curtain cloths, cover cloths, blanket, towels, shirting, quilts, underwear, carpet, industrial roller cloth, electric cabling, hosiery and in the manufacture of asbestos yarn, paper, linoleum, plastic and regenerated fibers. Focusing on willow waste, it is too short a fiber, to be used for any textile application and thus disposed off in the landfills. An investigation report denotes that, the total amount of willow waste generated in India is about 80, 000 to 85, 000 tons per annum, and this obviously needs proper treatment apart from disposal as landfill.

A survey report says that 1% of American landfill space was occupied by disposable diapers which take up to 500 years to decompose. Such waste discarded in landfills has no resale value and in addition to polluting the atmosphere, if not degraded, they get accumulated and spread infectious diseases and foul odour. An increasing amount of waste is generated apiece year from the production and use of textiles and in reality the rate of recycling in textiles, is not very high which is an issue to look forward. For economic and environmental reason, it is becoming increasingly necessary to recycle as much as possible. At the least 50% of the textiles that one throws away are recyclable, but in practical only 25% of wastes are recycled. An outlook on the future market of textiles summit that India is expected to grow around 3-5% in the area of disposals, sequentially that will increase such disposal in landfills. Each day many researches are being done to innovate new products and technologies but not many focus on the reclaim or a superior substitute of used up and waste textiles that is either incinerated (burnt) or discarded in the landfills.

A researcher in India found that one particular type of non-reusable waste, videlicet “willow waste” can be processed to become compost that can enable organic cotton to a viable enterprise. The research work aimed at biomanaging cotton waste by means of a three tier system of enzyme-earthworm-microbe interaction. Pretreatment and enzymatic treatment of the willow waste was done to enhance good growth of earthworms. The resultant compost, without addition of any other activators was purely textile compost, with a very good source of carbon, with appreciable amount of NPK. The parameters and their values were pH 7.20, Electrical conductivity EC 1.85 dS/m, Total nitrogen 0.62%, Total phosphorous 0.35%, Total potassium 0.52%, Organic carbon 12.1%, Copper 180 mg/kg, Zinc 210 mg/kg, Iron 35 mg/kg and Manganese 12  mg/kg respectively.

On addition of cellulose degraders, nitrogen fixers and phosphate stabilizers the compost can be converted into rich source of textile compost as biofertiliser. This is  an  effective  technology  for  managing  solid  organic  wastes prefabricated of textiles, into a highly beneficial  and  valuable  compost, that  can  be  used as a supplement to increase  soil  fertility, by creating home for millions  of microorganisms with an additional benefit of reducing the toxicity of the wastes. Subsequently, in  order  to  study  the  efficacy  of  the  prepared  willow waste biocompost, pot culture study was carried out for plants with short life span videlicet marigold,  lady’s  finger  and  green  gram  dhal. Considering  the  threat  of  pesticides  on  cotton cultivation,  cotton  plant  was  selected  as  one  among  the  four  the  plants  for  pot  culture  study. The results were highly commendable. Farmers as well as industrialist have to be educated properly about the industry byproducts and their effective utilisation. Producing such value added products will obviously help the farmers in getting additional income and also in meeting the raw material stipulation of the industry.

On a general note, Textile is one of the industry that exorcise maximum pollution to mom nature and the current buzz is the abuse of chemicals, in the form of fertilizers and pesticides, that has caused a downbeat on the health of animals, human and the general ecological equilibrise as well, apart from the fact that they are very pricey. Also, Cotton production alone uses about 25% of the world’s insecticides.  Large  quantities  of chemicals are  being  used to increase  the production  and productivity,  with  a least  concern about the  harmful  effects  induced  onto  the  next  generation. The WHO report points out, that apiece year 20,000farmers die because of insecticides and their harmful effects. Cotton being a very fertilizer dependant crop, has an undisclosed fact: that 65% of the chemicals used during cultivation enter both directly and indirectly into our food chain, which is highly agonizing. Undoubtedly, the manure castings excreted by worms, the so called vermicompost is a very effective biofertiliser, which has a high content of readily acquirable minerals for plant growth which can be an enormous relief to the above discussed hitch.

The research work was targeted on application of the concept for the recycling waste into wealth. Third world environmentalists havealso recognised the “return to the sender policy” as, the only effective means of discouraging toxic dumping and the research focuses on the same principle. We all moan and groan about the loss of the calibre of life through the destruction of our ecology, and yet apiece one of us, in our own tiny comfortable ways, contributes to that destruction daily. Now, we know the science, we see the threat, and this is high time for action.  Recollecting  the  words  of  the  Father  of  our  nation  Mohandas  Karamchand  Gandhi  “ You  must  be  the  change , you  wish  to  see  in  the  world” the  investigator  has  made  a sincere attempt to initiate all that mankind has and must do that is Recycling wastes and reduce pollution.

Waste has now become an index of growth. In the current decades, the textile industry has begun to grappling up its responsibility to the environment and to evaluate the impacts of its products and process. Increasing environmental consciousness has forced research and development efforts to search for innocuous methods in textile production and processing. where ecology might be the next new trend.  The research was done by Aishwariya, guided by Dr. S. Amsamani, both from the Department of Textiles and Clothing, Avinashilingam University for Women, India as a part of Masters Degree programme 2008.  The extension of this research is now worked by Aishwariya for her doctoral degree, where an attempt is prefabricated to study on conversion of hospital textile waste, domestic and post industrial wastes, effluent waste, diapers, sanitary pads and other nonwoven (disposals) into compost and evaluating the properties of the compost prefabricated from various textile wastes. The study is targeted on the success of growing cotton using the prepared compost as an aid and new innovation in the cultivation of organic cotton.

The concept can be explained to the Textile mill owners and Tamil Nadu Agriculture University and a MoU/Tie ups can be made, so that textile waste can be vermicomposted and the resultant compost can be useful for the cultivation of cotton in the organic way. Further the study can be extended on to comparing the fiber properties of the cotton plant that is cultivated using textile compost prefabricated from various textile waste and the readily acquirable commercial fertilisers. The theory can be prefabricated more effective by demonstrating the concept of recycling textile waste into compost to the women of Self Help Groups (SHG) which can wage them a means of mending money with a happiness that they have contributed to make connector a superior place to live in.  The intent can be brought to the notice of the municipality and Corporation departments so that they can allot separate bins to collect textile wastes and thereby the wastes can be sent for recycling. This is a new beginning which will throw smiles on my poor hard toiled farmer, by reducing the dependence, on pricey and perilous chemicals and pesticides.

“Remember the connector is not owned by you,

but loaned by you for the next generation”

S. Aishwariya [aishu55@gmail.com], Ph. D scholar *

Dr. S. Amsamani?[pmram_dr@yahoo.com}, Reader *

* Both the authors are with the department of textiles and clothing,?Avinashilingam?university for women, Coimbatore, India.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Next Page »

Bottom